<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rehearing Babies&#8217; Deaths</title>
	<atom:link href="http://familyfoundation.org/2007/11/rehearing-babies-deaths/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://familyfoundation.org/2007/11/rehearing-babies-deaths/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:31:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FamilyFoundationBlog.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Infanticide Ban Upheld By 4th Circuit!</title>
		<link>http://familyfoundation.org/2007/11/rehearing-babies-deaths/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>FamilyFoundationBlog.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Infanticide Ban Upheld By 4th Circuit!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.familyfoundation.org/?p=23#comment-124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The memories of the federal courtroom the last two Octobers — in 2007, for the Fourth Circuit three-judge panel&#8217;s hearing that eventually ruled the law unconstitutional, then last year&#8217;s full court hearing that resulted in yesterday&#8217;s opinion — and are still vivid. The lawyer from the Center for Reproductive Rights made her case by arguing that, should the Virginia statute be upheld as constitutional, her abortionist client could potentially face prosecution. During the course of her explanation, she actually described a potential situation in which the doctor fully delivers the child, who is then separated ... [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The memories of the federal courtroom the last two Octobers — in 2007, for the Fourth Circuit three-judge panel&#8217;s hearing that eventually ruled the law unconstitutional, then last year&#8217;s full court hearing that resulted in yesterday&#8217;s opinion — and are still vivid. The lawyer from the Center for Reproductive Rights made her case by arguing that, should the Virginia statute be upheld as constitutional, her abortionist client could potentially face prosecution. During the course of her explanation, she actually described a potential situation in which the doctor fully delivers the child, who is then separated &#8230; [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FAMILYFOUNDATIONBLOG.COM &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Update: Fourth Circuit Hears Appellate Arguments On Partial Birth Ban</title>
		<link>http://familyfoundation.org/2007/11/rehearing-babies-deaths/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>FAMILYFOUNDATIONBLOG.COM &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Update: Fourth Circuit Hears Appellate Arguments On Partial Birth Ban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.familyfoundation.org/?p=23#comment-123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Thro, Virginia&#8217;s former solicitor general, who has argued this case at each stage of appeal (see previous commentary that explains the case), argued for the commonwealth, although he recently accepted the job as university counsel at [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thro, Virginia&#8217;s former solicitor general, who has argued this case at each stage of appeal (see previous commentary that explains the case), argued for the commonwealth, although he recently accepted the job as university counsel at [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FAMILYFOUNDATIONBLOG.COM &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Breaking: Family Foundation Official Statement On Fourth Circuit&#8217;s &#8220;Absurd Ruling&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://familyfoundation.org/2007/11/rehearing-babies-deaths/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>FAMILYFOUNDATIONBLOG.COM &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Breaking: Family Foundation Official Statement On Fourth Circuit&#8217;s &#8220;Absurd Ruling&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.familyfoundation.org/?p=23#comment-122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Rehearing Babies’ Deaths [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rehearing Babies’ Deaths [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FAMILYFOUNDATIONBLOG.COM &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Breaking: Fourth Circuit Court Strikes Down Partial Birth Ban 2-1</title>
		<link>http://familyfoundation.org/2007/11/rehearing-babies-deaths/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>FAMILYFOUNDATIONBLOG.COM &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Breaking: Fourth Circuit Court Strikes Down Partial Birth Ban 2-1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.familyfoundation.org/?p=23#comment-121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] case was heard because of a Supreme Court ruling that upheld another partial birth abortion ban. Read our summary of the hearing in early November here, as well as more impressions we had after the oral arguments here. (On those threads are links to [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] case was heard because of a Supreme Court ruling that upheld another partial birth abortion ban. Read our summary of the hearing in early November here, as well as more impressions we had after the oral arguments here. (On those threads are links to [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
