No wonder the liberal politicians who control the House, Senate and presidency think the economy is flying: Their immediate surroundings are, in fact, humming. There is no recession in Washington, D.C., and when you stay insulated inside the beltway, and all you see is fat cats living it up from from $3.5 trillion in government spending, no wonder President Obama and Vice President Biden call this the :summer of recovery.”
Andrew Little, a Richmond investment banker with John B. Levy & Co. recently wrote in a Richmond Times-Dispatch column that the real estate market, which burst and led to the recession and remains in the tank around the country, is booming in Washington.
As one lender put it, “the closer you are to the printing press, the better chance you’ll have of getting some business.”
Another lender unfortunately described just how exclusive the area is that is attracting capital: “We are focused on Washington, D.C., but only inside the Beltway.”
A recent sale of the Evening Star Building at 1101 Pennsylvania Ave. in Washington fetched a mind-boggling $790 a square foot, and there is talk that other buildings currently on the market will surpass $900 a square foot.
These numbers indicate a strong desire for investors to put their money into real estate again. But if “frenzied” describes Washington and four other markets, “frail” is more apt for virtually everywhere else.
He adds that interest rates in D.C. are lower than most markets (thus the “printing press” comment). He then notes a Memphis, Tenn., apartment building that sold for a minuscule $2.1 million after costs, or less than $2,500 per unit, even though the average price per unit nationally last year was $72,306. The lender eventually lost $37.3 million on the project. Since this doesn’t qualify for pocket change in Washington, we doubt few in the leadership are raising a red flag of concern. But why should they? Not only is real estate booming in D.C., so, too, are salaries (see CNSNews.com).
According to a CBS News report yesterday:
Federal salaries have grown 33 percent faster than inflation. Their pay and benefits averaged $123,049 in 2009, up 36.9 percent since 2000. Private workers averaged $61,051, up just 8.8 percent during the same time.
Even when factoring out education and experience (federal workers have more of each), The Heritage Foundation’s James Sherk found that federal employees get paid 22 percent more per hour on average than private-sector workers. The facts get worse. Conn Carroll of Heritage’s The Foundry blog cites the Wall Street Journal’s findings that personal incomes fell nationally last year except in markets with heavy concentrations of federal employees, as well as a USA Today report that federal salaries average double private sector wages.
Not only that, but Heritage research shows that while private sector jobs have decreased by 6.8 percent since December 2007, federal government jobs have grown 10 percent. Government work at all levels have added 64,000 new jobs in that period while the private sector has lost 7.8 million jobs. I could go on. For example, President Obama is pushing for a 1.4 percent raise for 2 million federal workers who also qualify for seniority raises, not to mention his most recent bailout, this one for the teachers union and rising pay and benefits for local and state employees.
So, the more people suffer, the less Washington liberals know what to do. They seem to care even less. From what they see, all is good.










I am a former member of the military. I now work for a large defense contractor. For years I thought the expression “beltway bandit” an amusing term that most appropriately applied to defense contractors and their employees. Then I begin to notice where all the money was going.
Americans really don’t like spending money on weapons and defense systems. If the People cannot be persuaded that any threat exists, they will quickly cut defense spending — and they have. On the other hand, social programs and such can easily gain stronger and more durable support, support that no tank, fighter jet, or naval destroyer could ever hope to match. Why? Consider this old joke.
Question: What is an invulnerable weapons system?
Answer: That is a system with parts made in all 435 congressional districts.
From a congressional perspective, programs like the Dept. of Education and Social Security are unbeatable. All the money is spent in the USA, and the funds spent on such programs easily encourages strong lobbies in every congressional district.
Nonetheless, government spending on social programs only buys our votes because we are stupid. In the long run, not even the greedy pigs sucking off welfare and social programs gain anything of value. Look at what all that reckless spending is do to the private economy. It is parasitizing and killing the private sector. When the economy finally crumples, the lords and ladies passing out all the fat checks will suddenly become stern slavemasters. Once it owns everything, the government will have no one left to rob. We will all be poor — except the lordly elite.
Everything will belong to the state, and our new lords and ladies will not give what they consider their own away for nothing. Nope! If you don’t slave for them, you won’t eat.
[...] FamilyFoundationBlog.com » Blog Archive » Recession? What … [...]
[...] FamilyFoundationBlog.com » Blog Archive » Recession? What … [...]